#What_obstacle_in_scientific_progress_are_ulama_and_maulvi_?
Musicians were engaged in music in 1902, in 1962, and again in 2022. It makes no difference to the US space program.
Even in 1902, Western philosophers had these debates about what the reality of the soul was. This debate was going on in 1962 and in 2022 as well. This did not stop them from developing AI.
A Western historian was giving these arguments even in 1902 about how the Roman Empire fell; in 1962, he was giving lectures on the same; and in 2022, it was also rumoured that mobile phones would come. But it had no negative impact on US IT.
Then, how can it be claimed that the involvement of a scholar in the Qur'an and Hadith, a mufti's fatwa, or the protest of a religious group is the reason why we have progress in technology, science, etc., or is it "stereotyping"? People are people who have come so far.
It's just to scapegoat someone by giving up your life. Our educational department, which is in a state of disrepair, is a main-system problem. The purpose of education here was to lead the world. Then, whether it is education, research, or development, only the party considers it? What standard is the syllabus itself? What are the qualifications of teachers? Then, by mistake, if some people advance based on their abilities, their first priority is to leave the country, and their mind is damaged? Because what has to be done here is to control it, to leave its actions incomplete due to corruption? Now if someone actually leaves them and gets rid of the maulvi, that is a different thing. Then what is his claim that AI is not developed, not in his name, because of his privileges? got
Do not blame the scholars for your best efforts and failures; look within yourself.
0 Comments